In article <A5pf2JA9A6UHFwk1@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
Oz <Oz@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>Paul Ciszek <nospam@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> writes
>>
>>Thermal depolymerization and thermochemical conversion are faster and
>>more total, and more likely to be profitable in first world countries.
>
>Improbable as a feedstock given the very variable and impure nature of
>manures. Almost anything else would be better.
"Impure"? Thermal depolymerization works on wood chips, turkey guys,
old tires, AND manure. The trouble is, they made a big commitment to
the turkey-guts based operation, since their supplier wanted to get rid
of them, but after a while there were competing demands for turkey guts
and they had to start bidding against others. My understanding was that
manure was also wanted elsewhere, but it sounds like there are places
where they should be able to get it for free.
--
Please reply to: | "One of the hardest parts of my job is to
pciszek at panix dot com | connect Iraq to the War on Terror."
Autoreply is disabled | -- G. W. Bush, 9/7/2006
|
