The New York Times had a article on bats dying en masse in upstate New
York. The issue
was chronicled on Charlie Rose TV show tonight. And it was mentioned
about bees dying off en masse
also. Which I found surprizing that it came from the mouth of Charlie
Rose and not the scientist
from Cornell. Why surprizing? Because it should have come from the
Cornell scientist rather
than Charlie Rose.
But a very im****tant fact was omitted.
The fact that bees in France are not dying off en masse because a
nicotine based pesticide was
banned in France. This same pesticide is prevalently used in the USA
where bees and bats are
dying off.
Even a grade schooler of 10 years old can see some logic in that. That
if France banns and
prohibits a pesticide and thereafter no bees die off and no bats die
off in France, that there
would be some connection of the pesticide and the die off. Yet USA
uses the pesticide
prevalently and wastes alot of time in looking for anything other than
pesticides
and has bee and bat die off. Maybe the USA has only two logical
persons who can
reason?
