Talk About Network

Google





Agriculture > Poultry Farming > Re: costs of fe...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 19 of 35 Topic 2771 of 2938
Post > Topic >>

Re: costs of feed !

by A_ L _P <hay_hell_pea@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > May 8, 2008 at 09:21 PM

Jill wrote:
> A_ L _P wrote:
>>>
>> Restrictions on the use of table and restaurant scraps must have made
>> a difference to the nutrients available, compared with the "old days"
>> when chooks were like compost heaps - you put your spare edibles into
>> the chooks and got eggs & chicken meat.
> 
> Yes and no
> One has to be wary about comparing apples and pears.
> 
> In the "old days" commercial compound feed was already available for the

> big units, I have adverts for it in 1920's manuals. And then they added 
> more fishmeal and meat meal and bone meal and limestone and iodine and 
> phosferine - and all manner of additives !!! <grin> these old books are 
> wonderful.

Agreed.  I've got a small collection of old recipe and household 
management books and one of amazing recipes for everything from 
fireworks to ink  to - oh, no end of things.  Most of the ingredients 
completely impossible to obtain in small quantities - or at all - today.

But I was thinking of even earlier tines, in NZ the earliest European 
settlers in the early half of the 19th century.  Chickens would have 
been brought here as early as possible, i.e. by the first settlers, 
though probably not by the early sealers and whalers who did not intend 
to make their homes here.  They are fairly easy to trans****t by ****p and 
are easy to carry even without roads, to whatever out-of-the way place 
their owners were heading for, and they produce results quickly, you 
don't have to wait for long gestation then a long growing and fattening 
period.

There's a photo on
  http://history-nz.org/colonisation1.html
 captioned "Group outside a 
timber camp hut, circa 1900. Shows two women peeling potatoes, a man, a 
dog and chickens. Photograph taken by the Northwood Brothers."



> In the "old days" in the domestic situation all the waste was boiled up 
> with lots of meat and other protein. There was little surplus carbs like

> we have now. They were needed to fill human bellies up !!
> In the "old days" in the domestic situation one was not looking at birds

> who were as productive if they were scratching around the yard. But if 
> they cost little to feed then the quality of the protein was well worth
it.
> In the "old days" chicken as a meat was a relative rarity - not 
> something that was eaten several times a week.

My parents killed off the chooks after the first year's laying.  Later 
they got a bit more easy-going and kept them 2 years.  Nonetheless since 
the most they ever kept were a dozen (and the pullets coming along) 
poultry was a special treat.  Birthdays, Christmas.  Steamed or simmered 
first then roasted to tender golden perfection - and that real flavour 
that wasn't remotely like cotton wool.
> 
>>
>> Even so my parents had a tin of "meat meal" which got added to the
>> feed sometimes.  Don't ask me when or why: that was of no interest to
>> me at the time.
> 
> It was great stuff.
> 
>>
>> I'd be surprised if many chooks, household chooks anyway, lived on
>> grain.
> 
> Indeed, the scattering of the grain was a supplement, as it should be.
> 
>> They were like the pig, low-cost producers converting unwanted
>> stuff to valuable food.  Well, that's what I knew in New Zealand when
>> I was growing up.  Things have changed a lot since then.  Battery
>> farming for instance.  May the gods rot those who profit from it,
>> starting at the toenails & dandruff and working steadily till the rot
>> meets in the middle.
> 
> <grin>
> Battery farming has been around for over 150 years.
> And its not the producers fault that the human population has increased 
> so much with the associated demand for food.
> Battery farming is not the fault of those who run them, its the fault of

> the humans who demand the food they produce.
> Maybe Bird flu will be the chickens revenge !! reduce the human 
> population to a level whereby we do have sufficient land and stockmen to

> be able to put outside the birds we need to sup****t the numbers of 
> humans that are left.
> 
> ;@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
)
> 
> 
Go Gaia!  The Gaia hypothesis seems to have a few things going for it, 
the way war, plagues and "Acts of God" affect the most stressed parts of 
the world most frequently.  A re-balancing system underlying the 
human-directed layer of activities on the planet, a series of "equal and 
opposite reactions" that push the humans back to harmless levels every 
now and then.......  If nothing else it's comforting science fiction - 
balance again, counteracting all the doom-mongers!

A L P
 




 35 Posts in Topic:
costs of feed !
" Jill" <new  2008-04-27 10:27:36 
Re: costs of feed !
"shnuz@[EMAIL PROTEC  2008-04-27 13:18:38 
Re: costs of feed !
" Jill" <new  2008-04-28 08:19:38 
Re: costs of feed !
Steve Newport <steven@  2008-04-28 14:10:31 
Re: costs of feed !
" Jill" <new  2008-04-28 17:32:57 
Re: costs of feed !
"Amy Blankenship&quo  2008-04-28 11:51:26 
Re: costs of feed !
E Gregory <uepmeg@[EMA  2008-04-28 15:17:18 
Re: costs of feed !
" Jill" <new  2008-04-29 08:51:27 
Re: costs of feed !
"Christina Websell&q  2008-05-03 20:44:58 
Re: costs of feed !
" Jill" <new  2008-05-03 22:36:11 
Re: costs of feed !
"Christina Websell&q  2008-05-04 00:39:56 
Re: costs of feed !
" Jill" <new  2008-05-04 08:49:58 
Re: costs of feed !
"Christina Websell&q  2008-05-05 21:37:46 
Re: costs of feed !
"Jill" <mail  2008-05-05 22:14:44 
Re: costs of feed !
"Christina Websell&q  2008-05-07 21:46:03 
Re: costs of feed !
" Jill" <new  2008-05-07 23:44:35 
Re: costs of feed !
A_ L _P <hay_hell_pea@  2008-05-08 19:09:41 
Re: costs of feed !
" Jill" <new  2008-05-08 09:57:03 
Re: costs of feed !
A_ L _P <hay_hell_pea@  2008-05-08 21:21:13 
Re: costs of feed !
" Jill" <new  2008-05-08 10:53:38 
Re: costs of feed !
A_ L _P <hay_hell_pea@  2008-05-09 00:55:38 
Re: costs of feed !
"Christina Websell&q  2008-05-09 00:11:09 
Re: costs of feed !
"Christina Websell&q  2008-05-21 18:41:07 
Re: costs of feed !
" Jill" <new  2008-05-21 20:37:11 
Re: costs of feed !
"Christina Websell&q  2008-05-25 01:51:06 
Re: costs of feed !
" Jill" <new  2008-05-25 08:17:51 
Re: costs of feed !
"Christina Websell&q  2008-05-26 01:59:25 
Re: costs of feed !
" Jill" <new  2008-05-26 18:59:56 
Re: costs of feed !
"Christina Websell&q  2008-05-28 22:19:40 
Re: costs of feed !
pecan <pecanNOSPAM@[EM  2008-05-27 18:07:44 
Re: costs of feed !
"Christina Websell&q  2008-05-28 22:05:46 
Re: costs of feed !
"wafflycat" <  2008-05-28 23:47:05 
Re: costs of feed !
"Christina Websell&q  2008-05-29 02:49:28 
Re: costs of feed !
pecan <pecanNOSPAM@[EM  2008-05-29 08:43:30 
Re: costs of feed !
ooptec <ooptec@[EMAIL   2008-05-17 17:28:32 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
localhost-V2008-12-19 Fri Jan 9 17:15:29 PST 2009.