On Thu, 03 Jul 2008 18:15:42 +0100, Jill wrote:
What is this? PMS day?
> Gordie wrote:
>> NOW you say that I suggested something when -- YOU WON'T FIND A
>> SUGGESTION in my posts.
>
> You posted, on an open group, in a thread about an injured bird, that
> you left an open wound to be attacked by maggots in an uncontrolled way,
> and it had a good outcome despite this, that IS suggesting that it
> 'might' be a good idea for the OP to copy.
You continue to put words in my mouth. You were not there, I was. You
accuse me of things for which I am not guilty but you natter on.
- I DID NOT say that I left an open wound nor did I say that I did.
- I DID NOT allow the wound to be attacked by maggots nor did I say that
I did.
- You make assumptions and then say that because your assumptions (not
based on fact at all) MUST be correct then I am making suggestions.
READ every word and then sit back and understand what you have read and
then (only then) respond.
You either didn't read my posts or you didn't understand them or you
forgot what I posted the second you hit the reply button.
> It isn't.
> There is lots more evidence against it being a good idea, than for it.
> Which is what I provided. Fly strike is what your bird had, it is
> something that stockmen try to avoid at all cost, not encourage or
> promote as a possible way to solve the problem someone else has with a
> wounded animal.
You didn't read the article on Fly Strike or you didn't understand it or
you forgot it pretty quick.
- This is chickens NOT rabbits or sheep.
- This was a wound and not runny **** leaking from the ass and coating
the rear end. Maggots didn't travel up the digestive tract in my
chicken. Get your facts straight before replying.
I could tell you the whole story but it would be too dangerous because
you would be reading what I DON'T type and starting another fight.
Why are you so *****y anyway?
>
>
>> Moderate someone else.
>
> Its no moderation at all, its simply replying to your posts. You post to
> an open group, therefore inviting a response. I am aware, as I deal with
> the outcomes on a daily basis, just how much damage suggestions and
> ideas like that can do in the hands of novices who do not understand the
> alternative and usual consequences. This group is archived on google for
> prosterity - therefore its better that potentially dangerous intimations
> like allowing a bird to be afflicted by fly strike as a successful,
> therefore useful, method of treating wounds, have an alternative view
> posted so that any future reader can see other sides to the coin.
My chicken don't use Google. In your quest to be right at all costs you
are putting words in my mouth and I don't like it.
You got nothing to do? Don't do it here.
|
