V-for-Vendicar <Justice@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> writes
>
>"Fran" <Fran.Beta@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote
>> My point was that the use of land to raise fuel crops need not be at
>> the expense of food crops, since plainly, arable farmland is not being
>> used 100% to raise food.
>
> But it will still be at the expense of wildlife.
Of course.
The only real solution being a significant drop in world populations.
--
Oz
This post is worth absolutely nothing and is probably fallacious.
