"Campaign for Fresh Air" <letsstandup2bullies@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:sjknt3dqes210n1nthh3hnk569vt6abr7s@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Sat, 15 Mar 2008 13:29:18 +0000, Campaign for Fresh Air
> <letsstandup2bullies@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
>>On Sat, 15 Mar 2008 13:19:52 -0000, "Pat Gardiner"
>><patgardiner@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>
>snip<
>>>>
>>>>>Not with me for much longer, spammer. I'd have given you the benefit
of
>>>>>doubt for the initial bit of unsolicited commercial posts but you're
>>>>>advertising the same thing with no other topical input.
>>>>
>>>> Correct.
>>>>
>>>> A test posting that an real electrical/electronic engineer worth his
>>>> salt would have had (quite a few) comments on received content-free
>>>> reply.
>>>>
>>>> The man is a salesman of little technical expertise.
>>
>>I think that's what the village idiot Oz calls rocket science. He is
>>quite right of course the guy did come here seeking advice and he told
>>us he wanted to develop CCTV for farms.
>>
>>What he got was a whole lot of abuse from a few known wankers who are
>>desperate to spoil usenet at any cost. Quite ironic really.
>>
>>>I founded two highly successful computer companies, one a Plc. and I'm
>>>virtually computer technically illiterate.
>>>
>>>Running even a invocative technically based business does not demand
>>>great
>>>technical expertise. Indeed, it can be a disadvantage.
>>>
>>>Anyway, why be so rude to him. What has he done to you?
>>
>>I think they might still be a slight touchy from kick up the arse they
>>have been getting of late. That sort of behaviour will just ensure it
>>continues.
>>
>>>He has not been enquiring into your activities in respect of animal
>>>health,
>>>like me, has he?
>>>
>>>Nobody disputes that you are a technical genius,
>>
>>I do I think he's a wanker. The only difference between him and the
>>other dickheads is he knows he is!
Actually, you are quite right. I would not know, would I? He probably is
speaking gibberish appreciated only by other members of the Politburo. I
think it might be a Vance cult thing.
Now with Webster, I do know. Obviously, I studied economics, business and
international trade and have been involved in them all my life and
therefore
know that he is bluffing. He is a good bluffer, but it is all very
supeficial stuff that he has picked up in second hand bookshops, little
more
than gibberish and predudice to an agenda.
On history, which is an interest of mine, he is pretty good. Good enough
to
have the detail and to draw some deductions from what he has read, but
even
then it is pretty cranky at times and the deductions sup****t his warped
view
of the world.
It is actually all pretty Vance - the cult of deception.
I wish he would just answer the question that really unmasks him:
"Do you think the government should order that Defra test Britain's pigs
for
MRSA?"
The fact that the National Livestock Advisor of the Country Land and
Business Association, can't or won't answer the question rather tells us
everything.
--
Regards
Pat Gardiner
www.go-self-sufficient.com
>>
>>> but just look at the mess
>>>you have got yourself into over pigs and MRSA.
>>>
>>>Now that is something to be concerned about.
>
|
